{
  "@context": {
    "@language": "en",
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "CIP129": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0129/README.md#",
    "CIP136": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0136/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP136:body",
      "@context": {
        "govActionId": "CIP129:governance-action-identifiers",
        "summary": "CIP136:summary",
        "rationaleStatement": "CIP136:rationaleStatement",
        "conclusion": "CIP136:conclusion",
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name"
      }
    }
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256",
  "body": {
    "govActionId": "gov_action105mjyzm3spjppny2m776lwk5jnsuu07uva9tz0yg5u4nkf770rvsql5raht",
    "summary": "Pitkind finds this action unconstitutional. It allocates no ada for audits and oversight metrics required by Article II §7.4, and its DRep designation does not assign the monitoring and deliverable-assurance responsibilities required by §7.5.",
    "rationaleStatement": "The anchor hash is verified, the on-chain amount matches the document, Section 7(1)-(3) terms and the prior-funding disclosure are present, and 103,000 ADA is far below the attested NCL. However, Section 7 requires all listed standards, and 7(4) makes an ada allocation for independent audits and oversight metrics a mandatory component of every Treasury Withdrawals action, with no exception for reimbursements. The proposal acknowledges the provision and expressly allocates nothing: an affirmative conflict requiring NO. Section 7(5) is formally met (designation present; adequacy is for DReps) and 7(6) is inapplicable.",
    "conclusion": "Pitkind finds this governance action unconstitutional.",
    "references": [
      {
        "@type": "Other",
        "label": "Full deliberation report",
        "uri": "https://deliberative.cc/gov_action105mjyzm3spjppny2m776lwk5jnsuu07uva9tz0yg5u4nkf770rvsql5raht"
      }
    ]
  },
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Pitkind"
    }
  ]
}